Sunday, June 03, 2012
Few things get me as upset as an advertisement for a product
or service that is nothing more than a scam, but the copy or narration for the
ad is written in such a way that everything in it is essentially true. A few weeks back there was a two page color ad
in the Sunday supplement to the Cincinnati
Enquirer for a new way to get rid of cable or satellite television services
and “those costly monthly bills” and still get “over 900 programs” including
weather reports, movies, sports and children’s programming.
The ad went on to announce that a NASA scientist had
developed this breakthrough in technology that allowed the reception of free
channels by connecting this device to any digital TV. There were copious color pictures of an
assembly line filling orders and various testimonials from satisfied
customers. Was this just too good to be
true?
You may have already guessed that this ad was for a TV
antenna. That’s right, it may have been
made to look more contemporary but it was a set top antenna. The cost for this miracle device including
postage and shipping is some $60. This
same antenna can be purchased from Radio Shack for about $15.
I read the ad several times and there was nothing that was
untrue. Even the NASA scientist’s design
could be true if he made the antenna structure a bit different from older
models. So what is a consumer to do? Today there are so many devices that come to
market with features that only a few years ago would have been impossible. Some, like the magicJack, actually function
as promised; other products, like the antenna described above or gold plated
HDMI cables, are a rip off.
My suggestion is to stay away of any product that requires
advertising copy more lengthy than a novel.
An ad for products featuring Amish craftsmen involved in the manufacture
of high tech heaters is another dead give away.
And of course any ad that gives a specific time to call the 800 number
based on your zip code is a big red flag.
By the way, you can improve the rabbit ears reception by
adding a small sheet of aluminum foil.
That discovery did not require a NASA scientist.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home